Also would be nice if they would focus on bringing up NASL or USL teams with support rather than creating shit out of thin air with no fanbase (looking at you NYCFC, Miami, Atlanta, etc.). And then focus on markets that aren't diluted by having 3-4 other pro teams...figure something out in Vegas, go get Cincinnati (billionaire owner wants a team) with just 2 pro teams, that sort of thing. Fighting for Detroit and other markets that are probably over-invested in pro sports doesn't make as much sense as being the only or one of 1 or 2 other games in town. There's a reason some of the best MLS markets are Portland, Columbus, Orlando, Salt Lake City, even Kansas City with no NBA or NHL. Sacramento fits that model to a T.
There isn't much correlation between USL/NASL support and future MLS success. Let's look at the recent MLS expansion cities from 2007:
Toronto: Atrocious support for the Lynx in D2, yet Toronto FC has been a success
Seattle: A-League Sounders weren't supported that well, Sounders in MLS are one of the glamour franchises in the league
Philadelphia: No team to speak of kind of like New York City, Atlanta and Miami. Decent support considering the front office shit show
Portland: Great support in D2 and MLS
Vancouver: Decent support in D2, great support in MLS
Montreal: Great support in D2, shaky support in MLS. Montreal is just as flaky a sports town as Atlanta and Miami.
New York City: Cosmos not supported that well, great support so far in MLS
Orlando: Great support in USL and MLS. Want to see how support looks like after a few down years but I suppose that be said for Seattle, New York City and others as well
Major league cities do not support minor league sports well at all so using the minor league support barometer just doesn't work (see Seattle and Toronto). The new San Francisco NASL team will be finding this out the hard way.
Las Vegas is intriguing but it's a very tourist-based economy where a good amount of the workforce don't work typical 9-to-5 jobs. Will traveling fans make up for a loss of local support? Hard to tell.
Cincinnati only has two teams but the market is over-saturated. There isn't a lot of money in Cincinnati and there isn't a lot of MLS' target demographic in Cincinnati either.
Columbus and Kansas City have had attendance problems in the past so I would not put them in the group with Portland, Orlando and Salt Lake. Winning cures a lot of ills.
Leagues go where the money is. There are, IMO, 13 key markets a North American league needs to be in: New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, the Beltway, Bay Area, Boston, Philadelphia, the Metroplex, Houston, Miami, Atlanta, Seattle and Toronto. Those markets have an excellent corporate base with the amount of disposable income to match. Sacramento has some corporate money but not close to the level of the cities I've listed.
And if you don't think that markets and star power matter, take a look at MLS Cup ratings the past three years. Not shocking that Kansas City-Salt Lake and Columbus-Portland were two of the lowest rated MLS Cup in recent memory.
Rochester, NY would be a decent place too. The Rhinos have drawn well for a long time.
I remember when Rochester was every MLS fan's pick for expansion. It wasn't viable 15 years ago, it's not viable now.
Oklahoma City or Tulsa would be solid options down the road.
Looking forward to the inevitable shit show Rayo Oklahoma City will be.
Buffalo is 53. If you combine the TV population, it's 987k TV households. That's 30th, ahead of Hartford/New Haven but behind Nashville. I just don't think you can base a team in Rochester...are there enough people with enough money to sell 20k tickets to a pro sports team at those prices? Enough businesses for big club and suite sales as well as sponsorships?
Buffalo might be able to pull that off, but I'm betting that Buffalo is tapped out between the Bills and Sabers.
I wonder to myself how the hell Buffalo will afford to build a new stadium for the Bills. Same thing with St. Louis and the Rams.