Shocked Karl didnt keep him.
You should wonder less.
We normally do start them at the same time.
Am also excited. I have 113 million to spend on IFA. I went all in on stocking up for the future, I sure hope it's a good group.Actually pretty excited for this offseason, not sure where to spend my cash with so many good FA out there. Probably affects my team's future for the next 4+ years.
Am also excited. I have 113 million to spend on IFA. I went all in on stocking up for the future, I sure hope it's a good group.
You all gonna be sad when they turn out to be busts and injury cases.
Congratulations, I guess you can outbid me, unless you have 90m like the website says.Too bad i got 130 mil
Congratulations, I guess you can outbid me, unless you have 90m like the website says.
Can you fuckin read? Or did you just ignore that entire part of my post?
I can't see what anyone's draft/scouting/dev budgets are, so that's why I use "CAP SPACE" which is based on information that is readily available. It includes Dev, Scouting, Draft, FA, and IFA.
That doesn't include my scouting, dev, or draft budget, which would drop that 59 by 23 to 36 or so
By the way, I had like -25M in cash last year, so it's not a death sentence
If I had money to buy multiple FA I could literally compete this year Damn HAVES cutting their players for IFAs.
I don't even know which glue factory bum to pay $35M to in a 1 year contract... 1 roster spot and so many choices!
He ain't even doing the maths right either, lol, not sure how he got 90M based on what is on the website....
180M budget + 10M Cash = 190M
- 74.7M Payroll
=115M CAP SPACE (@Mr. Radpants). That's how much you got for FA, IFA, DEV, Scouting, and Draft based on the website.
Can you fuckin read? Or did you just ignore that entire part of my post?
Then you don't have $115M to spend either, lol. SMDH @ WOOLY
I've had it with these MILLENNIALS! Fucking @bruin hasn't even sent me a FA list. LRM gonna be fucked!
Travis is just a puppet.You should not being running two teams in the offseason. That is not right. Helping him set some rosters while running another teams is already a gray area. This is too far. If Bruin doesn't want to play, or be involved, that is fine, but another manager should not be running both teams and doing the offseason.
You should not being running two teams in the offseason. That is not right. Helping him set some rosters while running another teams is already a gray area. This is too far. If Bruin doesn't want to play, or be involved, that is fine, but another manager should not be running both teams and doing the offseason.
It was a fine trade. You don't know enough about it.You really expect the guy that traded his entire draft for a #4 SP to understand the nuances of budgets? SMDH @ YOU.
You should not being running two teams in the offseason. That is not right. Helping him set some rosters while running another teams is already a gray area. This is too far. If Bruin doesn't want to play, or be involved, that is fine, but another manager should not be running both teams and doing the offseason.
It was a fine trade. You don't know enough about it.
Travis is just a puppet.
This is infinitely better than letting a team sit.If he knows what the other guy wants and is making the offers, it's a competitive disadvantage. I was going to say something during the year, but I figured Travis was just helping Bruin out during the tech difficulties. It doesn't matter much if someone is just setting rosters, although they are in the same league and play each other a lot. However, it seems now that Bruin is either unable or uninterested in running the team (is it still a technical issue?), and Travis is putting the offers in. If Bruin doesn't want to run the team, that is fine, he can let it sit like Bdub did. It's not alright that Travis is really running two teams (in the same league even), and even worse when he is running both offseasons too. He knows too much about what the other guy is offering. Is he really going to compete over the same player the way other managers would? Come on, that's not right.
You should not being running two teams in the offseason. That is not right. Helping him set some rosters while running another teams is already a gray area. This is too far. If Bruin doesn't want to play, or be involved, that is fine, but another manager should not be running both teams and doing the offseason.
If he knows what the other guy wants and is making the offers, it's a competitive disadvantage. I was going to say something during the year, but I figured Travis was just helping Bruin out during the tech difficulties. It doesn't matter much if someone is just setting rosters, although they are in the same league and play each other a lot. However, it seems now that Bruin is either unable or uninterested in running the team (is it still a technical issue?), and Travis is putting the offers in. If Bruin doesn't want to run the team, that is fine, he can let it sit like Bdub did. It's not alright that Travis is really running two teams (in the same league even), and even worse when he is running both offseasons too. He knows too much about what the other guy is offering. Is he really going to compete over the same player the way other managers would? Come on, that's not right.