I'm really feeling shitty about my bama pick right now.Here's what I'm on today:
Wisconsin -3.5 (adjusted line)
Wisconsin over 27.5
Minnesota ML
Baylor -2.5
Fsu +7.5
Bama -8
I'm really feeling shitty about my bama pick right now.
When your most impressive victory is against Louisville, u da bess.SEC EAST 2014 BOWL UNDEFEATED LET US NEVER FORGET
The SEC lost its prowess when Mizzou went to conference shampship two years in a row. The media and the mouth breathing SEC fans just haven't reelized it yet.
Not at allu mad, reel?
U mad?Not at all
I asked a genuine question but of course, one real answer and the rest are typical u mad type responses
U gay?U mad?
Yeah he madU gay?
I don't think I've wished you a happy new yearYeah he mad
Agree with everything you saidHonestly, the SEC is a great conference. I troll them a lot but they for sure have some great teams and have played some great football. I think the problem is for a lot of people is not that they are jealous or "butthurt" but because SEC teams get way more benefits than teams in other conferences. I've brought it up before, but look at Arizona and Ole Miss. Both finished 8-5 last year after winning their bowl games. Ole Miss starts the season in the top 10 while Zona isn't even ranked until they beat Oregon on the road. I'm pretty sure Mississippi State and Ole Miss were in the top 10 after starting 5-0, whereas Zona was like 18th.
Plus, you don't just have people saying "SEC is #1." It's "SEC is #1 and everyone else is trash." The whole joke about people saying that SEC teams just weren't trying because it was the title game is an actual talking point for these people. No credit is given to the Pac-12 or Big 12. Fuck, a few days ago, I had some A&M fan on Facebook tom bout how WVU is Big 12 so they play flag football. HMMMMM. A&M played in the Big 12 three years ago and they were mediocre as shit. What does that tell you?
There is the whole "Oregon is weak" narrative because they lost to Stanford twice (they blew their doors off twice too but you never hear that) and LSU. Yet, I never hear "Alabama is weak" despite the fact that almost every time they play a team with a decent mobile QB (2008 Florida, Malzahn's Auburn, Johnny Football A&M, fucking OSU's 3rd string QB), they get lit up.
It's not about being jealous or butthurt or all that bullshit, it's about entire conferences getting treated unfairly. I hear the SEC get credit for "never having a week off" yet they play 8 conference games and play West Georgia Tech in November. Meanwhile, the Pac-12 and Big 12 play 9 conference games and (most) teams play tough OOC (for instance this year; UCLA played @UVA, basically @UT, and Memphis, Oregon played MSU, SC played ND and @BC, Cal went to NW and played BYU, etc.) All that in addition to the 9 game schedule. Yet the SEC "never has a week off."
@Reel
Plus the popularity contest that was the BCS (which the SEC greatly benefited from). The results of today's games has me continuing to question how many years the BCS "got it right."
I didn't think OSU had a chance and they just won. How do we know Oklahoma State wouldn't have won in 2011? Michigan State last year?
Agreed, but that's not an SEC problem but a BCS problem and their stubbornness to implement a playoff years ago.Plus the popularity contest that was the BCS (which the SEC greatly benefited from). The results of today's games has me continuing to question how many years the BCS "got it right."
I didn't think OSU had a chance and they just won. How do we know Oklahoma State wouldn't have won in 2011? Michigan State last year?
Fire Le Smiles . ComAgree with everything you said
I was still trying to figure out how lsu was even ranked with all the conference losses they had and they got beat pretty bad in a couple of those losses.
But imo ND should've beaten lsu. Lsu just wasn't a very good team this year at all. I can't speak for other SEC west teams.
My comment about the music city bowl was taken out of context (as usual). My comment was directed more towards the fact that there are too many "meaningless" bowl games.
Plus the popularity contest that was the BCS (which the SEC greatly benefited from). The results of today's games has me continuing to question how many years the BCS "got it right."
I didn't think OSU had a chance and they just won. How do we know Oklahoma State wouldn't have won in 2011? Michigan State last year?
According to @whiteyc_77, every year but 1. Oklahoma State was the worst one but there was also MSU and all the little guys that got left out. Plus 2012 Oregon, who was the best team Chip Kelly had. Would've curb stomped ND.
Plus, it's just fun to troll those SEC West fan people because for a lot of them this shit is their entire lives, which is hilarious and sad and doubly hilarious when they lose.
I just wanna say fuck that faggot ass mark may.
Someone find a vine of Corch finding out that "Oregon won by 40" during the post game conference. lol
Honestly, the SEC is a great conference. I troll them a lot but they for sure have some great teams and have played some great football. I think the problem is for a lot of people is not that they are jealous or "butthurt" but because SEC teams get way more benefits than teams in other conferences. I've brought it up before, but look at Arizona and Ole Miss. Both finished 8-5 last year after winning their bowl games. Ole Miss starts the season in the top 10 while Zona isn't even ranked until they beat Oregon on the road. I'm pretty sure Mississippi State and Ole Miss were in the top 10 after starting 5-0, whereas Zona was like 18th.
Plus, you don't just have people saying "SEC is #1." It's "SEC is #1 and everyone else is trash." The whole joke about people saying that SEC teams just weren't trying because it was the title game is an actual talking point for these people. No credit is given to the Pac-12 or Big 12. Fuck, a few days ago, I had some A&M fan on Facebook tom bout how WVU is Big 12 so they play flag football. HMMMMM. A&M played in the Big 12 three years ago and they were mediocre as shit. What does that tell you?
There is the whole "Oregon is weak" narrative because they lost to Stanford twice (they blew their doors off twice too but you never hear that) and LSU. Yet, I never hear "Alabama is weak" despite the fact that almost every time they play a team with a decent mobile QB (2008 Florida, Malzahn's Auburn, Johnny Football A&M, fucking OSU's 3rd string QB), they get lit up.
It's not about being jealous or butthurt or all that bullshit, it's about entire conferences getting treated unfairly. I hear the SEC get credit for "never having a week off" yet they play 8 conference games and play West Georgia Tech in November. Meanwhile, the Pac-12 and Big 12 play 9 conference games and (most) teams play tough OOC (for instance this year; UCLA played @UVA, basically @UT, and Memphis, Oregon played MSU, SC played ND and @BC, Cal went to NW and played BYU, etc.) All that in addition to the 9 game schedule. Yet the SEC "never has a week off."
@Reel
Houston are a bunch of cheesers. 4 verts and run the QB against man coverage.
I love in CFB when a dude scores and the old white back judge can't run over fast enough to yap at him to stop "celebrating" which of course is a rather grandiose term for pointing to the sky or something.