Something that may be of note (warning the following will be incredibly boring)--
Today the Court granted cert in the case Lee v. Tam. Essentially some dense rock band attempted to trademark their band name, "the slants." The Trademark Office told them to kick rocks because there is a provision of the relevant federal law that basically allows the USTO to deny a trademark that contains racial epithets ("[c]onsists of . . . matter which may disparage . . . persons, living or dead, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols, or bring them into contempt, or disrepute."). Naturally "the slants" filed a lawsuit claiming that this provision of federal law violates their First Amendment right to free speech.
Naturally you ask, why should we care? Why the hell is CJ posting this in the NFL thread? Have the Supreme Court briefs scrambled his brain? The answer is the Washington Redskins. If the Court upholds this provision, the Washington Redskins could lose the trademark of their logo (which, I believe is currently the subject of a lawsuit based on the same provision. And that suit is, I think, currently stayed in the Fourth Circuit). An outcome that upholds the law will basically force the 'skins to change the name of their footbaw team.
That's why you may care. That's why this is in the NFL thread. And it is probably true that the Supreme Court briefs have "warped my fragile little mind."
also, obligatory: