*whispers*
Jayson Tatum was probably the best 19 year old player on the floor last night
Fixed it for you.
-YTC
*whispers*
Jayson Tatum was probably the best 19 year old player on the floor last night
Y’all are vastly underestimating the star power.
I mean holy shit that Lakers team is stacked. They have three players better than anyone on the Celtics
Dwigt was one of the best five players in the league that year
Y’all are vastly underestimating the star power.
I mean holy shit that Lakers team is stacked. They have three players better than anyone on the Celtics
Dwigt was one of the best five players in the league that year
So, in the span of 2 weeks we've gone from:
To "This team isn't as good as the 2000 76ers." WATTBA
- Touting how great Al Horford is
- Touting how Jayson Tatum is the greatest 19 year old ever
- The greatest GM and Coach in NBA History
- Terry Rozier better than Ben Simmons
-YTC
AI literally won the MVP that season. So is having the best player in the league not important? They won the conference in the regular season
Ur definitely trolling so I’ll just say that I’m sorry for ur post season lots
Simmons has looked AWFUL for 6.5 quarters of this series. Getting completely outplayed by Scary Terry
But I guess we can judge who is a better player based on something else?
-YTC
I thought your lifetime meant when you were alive
I think we just value teams and individuals differently. I'm a believer in the sum of the whole is greater than the sum of the parts in some cases, mostly with great corching. You are more interested in the best part than the whole. I do think you need a go to guy to be a great team, but I still say the celtics are way better than the Magic team who went to the finals
Honestly though if you define your lifetime as "finals I've watched" then that's something I can't argue. If you started watching in 2010 then you're definitely right. I thought your lifetime meant when you were alive.
This is a bold jump in logic
He will define it in whatever way makes Ainge and Stevens look the best.
-YTC
I think we just value teams and individuals differently. I'm a believer in the sum of the whole is greater than the sum of the parts in some cases, mostly with great corching. You are more interested in the best part than the whole. I do think you need a go to guy to be a great team, but I still say the celtics are way better than the Magic team who went to the finals
Honestly though if you define your lifetime as "finals I've watched" then that's something I can't argue. If you started watching in 2010 then you're definitely right. I thought your lifetime meant when you were alive.
that magic squad had (no google)
Howard
Hedo T
and Jameer Nelson
i dont remember anyone else
Rashad Lewis before he died the next year
So, in the span of 2 weeks we've gone from:
To "This team isn't as good as the 2000 76ers." WATTBA
- Touting how great Al Horford is
- Touting how Jayson Tatum is the greatest 19 year old ever
- The greatest GM and Coach in NBA History
- Terry Rozier better than Ben Simmons
-YTC
That Nets team with Jason Kidd was pretty bad, too. The East in general has been a loose poop for about 20 years now.
We're talking about bad finals teams and I'm not 60 years old lol.Can you clarify which Knicks team? They are all varying degrees of bad.
A lot of Knicks finals teams to pick from in the 90s
There are two. I meant the 99 team.A lot of Knicks finals teams to pick from in the 90s
Exactly. They had a hof pg in his prime. Not some random "star" lol. They just played great teams.I don't think I'd put those Nets teams in that tier, even though they were hella outmatched.