The more I think about the Dansby signing, the more I question what the Browns were thinking (shocker, I know). He might be a small step up from DQ, but he'll be 33 in November and the deal is front-loaded with $10M the first year. To me, it seems like an oddly structured contract for an old dude who's really only had 1-2 monster years, to me.
I don't know what to think about Dansby, but I disagree a little on how it is structured. I look at it as they are paying him for the next two years when he is most likely and will be expected to be good and to contribute, then he will be cut or the Browns will be getting a deal if he is still a solid player in the back half of the contract. I would have been more pissed if the deal was spread out and they have to take the cap hit in year 3 and 4 when he sucks or is cut. I would be shocked if he makes it past his second year.