B1G > NFC East
Iggles could win da East only because they find ways to step on their own dick less than the Redskins, Giants, and Cowboys.
You could just posted this. No justification is needed.
First of all, I don't believe for one second that the NFL didn't see the video, but even if I make that miraculous leap, then they are still open to heavy criticism. Rice's lawyer had the video. Goodell could have simply told him to bring it with him to their meeting. The NFL also has so many former federal and local law enforcement officers working in their security department, that any number of them could have called in a favor and easily obtained a copy of the tape from the police department or casino itself. Now TMZ and the AP just get the video with ease? They are more powerful than the NFL lol.
The only plausible explanation is that the NFL purposely didn't see the video, even though it was made available. This allows the league to say "honestly" that it hadn't seen the elevator video before yesterday. To me, it's plausible deniability, to me.
-YTC
But why then tell reporters like Schefter that you saw the video?
You forgot to put in Ray McDonald punching his pregnant fiancée and being allowed to play.
The NFL has reached and passed the point it believes it is now too big to fail.
I wouldn't be surprised if the NFL didn't already know that tape was "leaked" to TMZ and was prepared to just bury Ray Rice and assume the public would be too naive and just believe whatever they say, regardless of the contradiction. At this point I wouldn't be surprised if they actually released the tape to TMZ.
You forgot to put in Ray McDonald punching his pregnant fiancée and being allowed to play.
Mark Cuban was right.
Do I have the chain of events correctly?
- Rice punches out a woman
- Rice gets suspended 2 games
- Goodell comes out and says that only 2 games was a mistake and the new policy is a 6 game suspension for a first offense of something like this
- Video comes out
- Rice is suspended indefinitely
Not that I think the punishment is too harsh, but why does he get an indefinite suspension when they literally just created a rule saying 6 games is going to be the punishment as a reaction to this exact incident?
NFL will say that the incident all occurred before the new policy. Therefore, it can be lumped in under the "old policy" which was no policy and the punishment is up to the discretion of the commissioner.
Which is going to be hilarious when a new drug policy is agreed upon in the next 24-48 hours and Josh Gordon and Wes Welker are reinstated because they would not have been guilty under the new policy guidelines.