I didn't want to clutter up all the 2049 playoff talk, so I'll just put all my stuff here.
So, based on a cumulative WAR for the whole league of 639 in 2049, and 1459 actual wins (because obviously we had one mystery extra game, lol), the hypothetical "Replacement" team gets you 45.6 wins, on average, just FYI.
Table is submitted for your viewing pleasure. It is sorted by total wins, so the top 8 teams are your playoff teams and:
*$/WAR - This was calculated as (Team Salary - Full team replacement cost (25x490k)) / Total WAR, since hypothetical "Replacement" players would still cost 490k each
*Corch wins - This was calculated as Actual Wins - (WAR + 46.5) This can either be attributed to pure luck, or to coaching. WAR+46.5 is the portion statistically attributable to the players statistical performance.
Based on this, I give the 2049 BTT Manager of the Year Award to @Gooksta. He made the playoffs with a payroll only 40% of the top payroll, and he had 8 corch wins, which is likely too much to just attribute to luck alone.
The 2049 TANKEE Award goes to @Yankee151. How fitting. All joking aside, Yankee actually did a good job of accomplishing his goal. He had the lowest payroll in the league and ended up with the #2 draft pick, while paying the least amount of money in salary and still winning 50 games. All of that adds up to getting a good draft pick while not overly fucking his financial future. He also had 8 Corch wins. Other teams who know they aren't going to make the playoffs or desire to tank might look at him as an example. If you're going to be a bad team, you should at least be cheap about it.
I was pleased to find that Mr. Manager's sperging and focus on fiscal conservatism paid off, as the riggers ranked #1 in $/WAR and #2 in $/win.
So, based on a cumulative WAR for the whole league of 639 in 2049, and 1459 actual wins (because obviously we had one mystery extra game, lol), the hypothetical "Replacement" team gets you 45.6 wins, on average, just FYI.
Table is submitted for your viewing pleasure. It is sorted by total wins, so the top 8 teams are your playoff teams and:
*$/WAR - This was calculated as (Team Salary - Full team replacement cost (25x490k)) / Total WAR, since hypothetical "Replacement" players would still cost 490k each
*Corch wins - This was calculated as Actual Wins - (WAR + 46.5) This can either be attributed to pure luck, or to coaching. WAR+46.5 is the portion statistically attributable to the players statistical performance.
Based on this, I give the 2049 BTT Manager of the Year Award to @Gooksta. He made the playoffs with a payroll only 40% of the top payroll, and he had 8 corch wins, which is likely too much to just attribute to luck alone.
The 2049 TANKEE Award goes to @Yankee151. How fitting. All joking aside, Yankee actually did a good job of accomplishing his goal. He had the lowest payroll in the league and ended up with the #2 draft pick, while paying the least amount of money in salary and still winning 50 games. All of that adds up to getting a good draft pick while not overly fucking his financial future. He also had 8 Corch wins. Other teams who know they aren't going to make the playoffs or desire to tank might look at him as an example. If you're going to be a bad team, you should at least be cheap about it.
I was pleased to find that Mr. Manager's sperging and focus on fiscal conservatism paid off, as the riggers ranked #1 in $/WAR and #2 in $/win.