fanoftgame
Active Member
Here is my thoughts. My adjective is to play defense like smartfootball.com article on nick saban. Stop the run on run downs with zone blitzes. On pass downs play man coverage to get off the field.
I want to force lower ranked wr to beat me !!
How I thought about doing this based on ncaa video games is using bracket or double teams since pressure isnt feasable now.
My idea is to double any star player and put my best cover cbs on the lesser wr like the slots.
So i have their stud doubled and make their medium level wrs beat my best cbs consistantly.
I banking on the fact that their lesser wr cant beat my best cb play after play and entually my best cbs will make a turnover or a play for turnover on downs.
Now there are obviously a few issues with this.
1. Multiple studs on a team.
With a 4 man rush I have 2 payers i could double. 3man rush and could double 3(tho thats asking for qb runs for big yardage).
2 What if they pass majority of the time?
Im not sure on this for couple reasons. Staying in the same coverage over and over people will eventually start to figure it out better. But mainly runing same play over and over is boring and no fun:p
I would have to mix in some maybe cover 2 tampa with a dl in a spay to cover hook in front of mlb.
Also thought if have to play zone would be to man there star and everybody esle play zone. This would bracket their star even though d would be technically unsound.
Need help here.
3. what if you have bad cbs that cant handle anyone 1on1.
This may be said about ever cb in ncaa it seems like. However I look at my defense as a more bend but dont break d instead of sabans more agressive approach. The weaker wides may beat my cbs on the fist few sets of downs or even possesions but eventually the cbs should make a play. And in a game where its more like arena football in terms of scoring turnovers and one possion extra for the offense is now what i call good defense
I dont run defense with everyone in coverage. I will always rush at least 3.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
I want to force lower ranked wr to beat me !!
How I thought about doing this based on ncaa video games is using bracket or double teams since pressure isnt feasable now.
My idea is to double any star player and put my best cover cbs on the lesser wr like the slots.
So i have their stud doubled and make their medium level wrs beat my best cbs consistantly.
I banking on the fact that their lesser wr cant beat my best cb play after play and entually my best cbs will make a turnover or a play for turnover on downs.
Now there are obviously a few issues with this.
1. Multiple studs on a team.
With a 4 man rush I have 2 payers i could double. 3man rush and could double 3(tho thats asking for qb runs for big yardage).
2 What if they pass majority of the time?
Im not sure on this for couple reasons. Staying in the same coverage over and over people will eventually start to figure it out better. But mainly runing same play over and over is boring and no fun:p
I would have to mix in some maybe cover 2 tampa with a dl in a spay to cover hook in front of mlb.
Also thought if have to play zone would be to man there star and everybody esle play zone. This would bracket their star even though d would be technically unsound.
Need help here.
3. what if you have bad cbs that cant handle anyone 1on1.
This may be said about ever cb in ncaa it seems like. However I look at my defense as a more bend but dont break d instead of sabans more agressive approach. The weaker wides may beat my cbs on the fist few sets of downs or even possesions but eventually the cbs should make a play. And in a game where its more like arena football in terms of scoring turnovers and one possion extra for the offense is now what i call good defense
I dont run defense with everyone in coverage. I will always rush at least 3.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2